|
Post by GM-Elsaak on Feb 4, 2008 16:56:23 GMT 1
no, it's right : when you heard "8 days per week", that's mean "7 days a week and 1 days extra" on monday's update, he has won it's 1 extra day by week and that's all.
next monday, he will have 10 days left, and then in 2 Mondays, 2 days left.
|
|
|
Ranking
Sept 19, 2007 15:00:32 GMT 1
Post by GM-Elsaak on Sept 19, 2007 15:00:32 GMT 1
and in that case, what the valorisation for players using less than 6 minutes (ie : without any note)...?
|
|
|
Post by GM-Elsaak on Sept 29, 2007 12:15:06 GMT 1
exactly !
|
|
|
Post by GM-Elsaak on Jul 31, 2007 15:52:54 GMT 1
I would like to open a debate about existence of continental championship, continental teams, and continental NT. According to my experience as manager and NC, I think continents should not exist in anyway but championships: All managers register in Asia, Oceania, Europe, Africa or South América belong to a real country. So it would better to join our own country: -If it is a "big enough to have its own championship", then move to it. -If not, then join a small country, and all the small countries (I mean, under 10 teams, for example), play together in a united championship (geographical or not..). USA, Israel, UK, Japan, Andorra... could also for instance join these championships. When a country overall 15 teams, they could form a new specific league. IMO, a championship under 7 teams is not very interesting or exiting. In that way, a Greek manager can still have is team, pull new young trainees, a Canadian, a Tunisia or a Chinese too... Then, about continental teams: It could be difficult for managers (like me or some other) who have build a team with young players from this citizenship in order to train them until NT to change this point. In another hand, this is quite unfair to have good young players which could never involved any NT because their NT doesn't exist. This is unfair and unrealistic. So I think the "continental Coach" should be allowed to call any player from those small countries : in Africa, for instance, I would be able to base our team on South-African, Egyptian, Tunisian or Senegalese players... In that way, maybe Asia could have a competitive team, and Europe also. I made a quick poll with other managers from Africa, Asia and Oceania, and a majority is already OK for joining together. I don't know what about changing Europa, Africa or other "continental-ity", this is just my today's idea Anyway, before Anders just imagine to begin working about such a kind of simplification, what to you think about it ?
|
|
|
Post by GM-Elsaak on Aug 1, 2007 15:56:27 GMT 1
it seems that all matches are in #3 or #4 arenas...
|
|
|
Post by GM-Elsaak on Jul 20, 2007 9:02:57 GMT 1
well, I lost against galouchh, and I'm now totally out for the semis...
RK Varteks DiCaprio has already planed a game instead of mine, I'll take another challenger...
|
|
|
Post by GM-Elsaak on Jul 16, 2007 16:11:23 GMT 1
I cannot challenge "RK Varteks DiCaprio" for day3... He may have already planed a game I'll ask him by MP...
|
|
|
Post by GM-Elsaak on Jul 7, 2007 14:50:02 GMT 1
according to the HMWCC' rules, I think galouchh would say "OK for your other friendly", because RK varteks is withdrawal.
Galouchh cannot log by now, so we consider it for him.
|
|
|
Post by GM-Elsaak on Jul 6, 2007 14:44:33 GMT 1
Ooooooooh ! you're right, zujo ! he was exactly saying... the opposite ! well, I hope you understood my answer, and I prefer galouchh comes back and validate this soon....!
|
|
|
Post by GM-Elsaak on Jul 6, 2007 11:09:28 GMT 1
I know that teams qualified to the next round keep their points winning in games against the other selected teams.
That means : PLG won against his two fellows, Konjarnik lost his 2 confrontations, and 4 others teams get one lost, one win.
|
|
|
Post by GM-Elsaak on Jul 6, 2007 8:48:42 GMT 1
Well their is any mistake in my group D, there stand that mij team be the nummber 4 in this group but still i am the number 3 in this group! sorry that my english not so good is... you mean : you are RK IMT, and you don't understand why you are finnally before spies-boys at the end of the round, even if your Goalaverage is worst ? I think it's because in your private game, game#3, you win over him (36-33). But I'm not sure.... Could you wait galouchh comes back
|
|
|
Post by GM-Elsaak on Jul 6, 2007 8:42:29 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by GM-Elsaak on Jun 23, 2007 15:09:27 GMT 1
euh, dsl ! j'étais tellement heureux de cette victoire...!
|
|
|
Post by GM-Elsaak on Jun 22, 2007 7:49:55 GMT 1
HBC Girondins - Elsaak = 27:32
|
|
|
Post by GM-Elsaak on May 22, 2007 13:39:50 GMT 1
message posted in the French forum (now closed, this one is the only official one !) :
Aubagne HBC (ID 1169) - Aymeric
|
|