|
Post by GM-CeeKay on Nov 14, 2006 12:08:06 GMT 1
We all know that money was easy to make in handballmanager. Because of the easy moneymaking, wages have been doubled.
Please, put here your thougts and reactions about it.
Kindly Regards
MOD-CeeKay
|
|
BeRT
Assistent Coach
Posts: 74
|
Post by BeRT on Nov 15, 2006 11:48:01 GMT 1
lones = wages
|
|
|
Post by GM-CeeKay on Nov 15, 2006 12:43:21 GMT 1
haha... just ! 'k heb't ondertss. aangepast
|
|
|
Post by schmu on Nov 15, 2006 17:38:10 GMT 1
haha, my wages increased from 6k to 13k.......what a loss ^^
|
|
|
Post by rotten on Nov 21, 2006 16:30:23 GMT 1
7 to 15k
I think the "problem" is that we have huge stadium and week players whit low wages.
|
|
|
Post by MOD-Booziewoozie on Nov 21, 2006 20:34:09 GMT 1
I have 17k wages now, didn't even noticed the changes (if you want to know how small of an impact it has done )
|
|
|
Post by GM-JRGalo on Nov 21, 2006 23:10:00 GMT 1
I noticed then about two weeks ago, but only on people over 20
|
|
|
Post by Scream Belgium on Jan 9, 2007 19:25:49 GMT 1
met alleen de lone lost ge da probleem nie op denk ik die manager van de spelers werkt alleen ma tege want nu zijn de prijze nog harder gestege ge kunt beter ne maximum toeschouwers oplegge want nu zijn er ploege die elke wedstrijd veel geld verdiene
|
|
|
Post by st_alex on Jan 9, 2007 20:21:53 GMT 1
man this is global english please
|
|
|
Post by Scream Belgium on Jan 10, 2007 19:26:46 GMT 1
ge verstaag het toch hé
but here the translation
with just raising the wages you don't solve the problem I think that giving a percentage of the saleprise to the manager of the player only causet to let the prises rise even more because there are fewer great players on sale so they are even more expensive then before I believe you can better have less money out of the tickets from you're stadion because a lot of teams earn a lot of money for each game at there own stadium
|
|
|
Post by elpiase on Jan 11, 2007 11:09:12 GMT 1
The problem for the economy is not the wages, or the money from the ticket. In a normal week I have more entry from the sponsor then exits for wages, staff and arena.
Example from the last two weeks:
Income [ € ] From sponsor 161 944 Expenses [ € ] Sum 152 697
Previous week Income [ € ] From sponsor 153 391 Expenses [ € ] Sum 152 387
In my opinion is better to low the income from sponsors, so we can have 1 week with a positive balance (when we play at home) and a week with negative balance (when we play outside). Till now the only weeks where I had negative balance was when I bought some players.
|
|
|
Post by GM-CeeKay on Jan 11, 2007 12:26:31 GMT 1
1 problem. in 1 week we play outside AND inside. So actually it doesn't matter, he puts 2 weeks in 1 week... So it's still the same.
|
|
|
Post by elpiase on Jan 11, 2007 13:43:23 GMT 1
1 problem. in 1 week we play outside AND inside. So actually it doesn't matter, he puts 2 weeks in 1 week... So it's still the same. Yes, you are right, but for example last week I play 3 games outside (also the friendly) and with the only incoming from the sponsor (and a little money from friendly) my balance was still active. Income from sponsors: 153 391 Total Expenses: 152 387 In this way the sponsors cover all my expenses, and all the incoming from the tickets are free, I can use for buy players or, better, to increase my arena, that means more incoming from the tickets and more money...
|
|
|
Post by Scream Belgium on Jan 11, 2007 20:07:39 GMT 1
yes but not everybody has so much sponsor I only have only 68 000 and every week I start with the red figures so that makes that the rich teams only get more advantage
|
|
|
Post by Metropolis on Jan 11, 2007 23:35:03 GMT 1
well rich team are richer than u probably couse they start earlier and they are in higher leagues , have 250 economist etc.. so only thing u need to do is make a good training program try to earn some extra cash on transfers and wait till u became rich too
|
|