|
Post by Anders Busch (admin) on Nov 22, 2006 18:55:26 GMT 1
Hi Anders. I have one question in my mind I can't find answer to. I've read the game rules, the forum, but nothing. So here it is: how is the number of the spectators of a game calculated? Is there a formula? I guess it depends on the league (higher league - more spectators) and on the number of fans(more fans - more spectators). What else? Does it depend on the team I play against (a well positioned team - more spectators) ? Also, does it depend on my league position? I would appreciate if you could tell me (or everyone) the formula if there is one. This would be very important so that I could know how big the stadium should be. I look forward to your response. Thanks and good luck. The following gives more spectators - Higher league
- Better positions for the home team
- Teams come from same region
- Size of the fan clubs
- Home team won the last match
- Better positions for the away team
|
|
|
Post by MOD-The Flame on Nov 25, 2006 17:48:55 GMT 1
Can you get up to 100.000 spectators? Or will it stop when it has reached the limited spectators? And if it does, what's the max specs u can have?
|
|
Goldmaker
Assistent Coach
?kersberga HK
Posts: 52
|
Post by Goldmaker on Feb 19, 2007 13:07:25 GMT 1
How come my income from the spectators is lower sometimes, when I have the same numbers of spectators? The 2 last homegames I have: Seats: 1700 of max 1700 spectators VIP: 100 av max 100 spectators The first match (12/2): Your team have played a match and you got 433 800 SEK from tickets. The second match (19/2): Your team have played a match and you got 367 200 SEK from tickets. Why the difference...
|
|
|
Post by schmu on Feb 19, 2007 14:10:04 GMT 1
I think he has lowered the ticket prices because it was way too easy to make money in this game
|
|
|
Post by dragosv on Feb 19, 2007 16:22:11 GMT 1
What I don´t understand, it´s that i won a match today, and I got only 2 fans after the training?¿¿?
|
|
|
Post by dragosv on Feb 19, 2007 21:17:57 GMT 1
I think that lowering the tickets prices isn´t the best idea. The guy that has the triple capacity of a stadium, wil get the triple income than the one who has a normal size. So it´s still is an advantege to have a big stadium. I think that the improvement must be to equal the things between big stadium and medium stadiums.
|
|
|
Post by GM-CÄÜLLÄY on Feb 19, 2007 22:33:25 GMT 1
I think that lowering the tickets prices isn´t the best idea. The guy that has the triple capacity of a stadium, wil get the triple income than the one who has a normal size. So it´s still is an advantege to have a big stadium. I think that the improvement must be to equal the things between big stadium and medium stadiums. Had to Bold that bit there... Lets go to football/soccer for a moment... Do you see a big sized stadium (Manchester United, Liverpool, Arsenal, Chelsea) recieving similar money to a medium sized stadium? (Bolton, Wigan, Manchester City, West Ham) There is no chance at all under normal circumstances to get equal profit from medium and large stadiums, if it was the case, then there would be no need for large stadiums, and everyone will get medium sized ones. And then when these medium sized stadiums are the largest in handball... then the smaller clubs will want it harder once again to make money, leading to stadiums slowly getting smaller as the years go on. I probably cant explain it right... i'll just put it in a few words That wont be a good idea ;D
|
|
|
Post by MOD-djthoms on Feb 19, 2007 23:10:43 GMT 1
and.... it is also more expensive to affort the big stadiums
|
|
|
Post by dragosv on Apr 21, 2007 1:55:28 GMT 1
I think that lowering the tickets prices isn´t the best idea. The guy that has the triple capacity of a stadium, wil get the triple income than the one who has a normal size. So it´s still is an advantege to have a big stadium. I think that the improvement must be to equal the things between big stadium and medium stadiums. Had to Bold that bit there... Lets go to football/soccer for a moment... Do you see a big sized stadium (Manchester United, Liverpool, Arsenal, Chelsea) recieving similar money to a medium sized stadium? (Bolton, Wigan, Manchester City, West Ham) There is no chance at all under normal circumstances to get equal profit from medium and large stadiums, if it was the case, then there would be no need for large stadiums, and everyone will get medium sized ones. And then when these medium sized stadiums are the largest in handball... then the smaller clubs will want it harder once again to make money, leading to stadiums slowly getting smaller as the years go on. I probably cant explain it right... i'll just put it in a few words That wont be a good idea ;D I didn´t ment to say that the teams with large stadiums should recieve the same income from matches like the medium stadiums. I ment to say that the improvement should make, so there weren´t so big the diference between big stadiums and medium stadiums and small ones too. There is a big diference between the stadiums from 1st division comparing it with the 2nd division. In the 1st division there are almost 15.000 spectators, and in the 2nd there are 10.000. So a team in the first division, will get 50% more then a team in the second division.
|
|