|
Post by Anders Busch (admin) on Sept 20, 2006 20:46:06 GMT 1
match importance only has effect on League & Cup matches. It has no effect on friendly matches.
|
|
Zegineitor
Assistent Coach
Translator - Espa?ol (Spanish)
Posts: 91
|
Post by Zegineitor on Sept 20, 2006 23:25:42 GMT 1
I just don't understand one point. The only problem about playing an "important match" is that your players' injuries would be longer? Playing "Important match" would not affect next matches?
|
|
|
Post by Anders Busch (admin) on Sept 21, 2006 6:47:47 GMT 1
If you play important in the last match and you play "important match" the next then there is a big change that the players get annoyed and play worse than normal.
Playing "Important match" affects the next match if it is also played as "Important match" then players don't play good.
|
|
|
Post by piranha on Oct 2, 2006 11:20:28 GMT 1
If you play important in the last match and you play "important match" the next then there is a big change that the players get annoyed and play worse than normal. that I understand.Now there is another question : If I played 1 or 2 matches "take it easy"?what is the benefit?After I played 2 matches "take it easy" my team will play better than normal?even if I play "normal"??
|
|
paopao
Junior Coach
AMA TEAM 4.9 Romania
Posts: 21
|
Post by paopao on Oct 8, 2006 12:10:33 GMT 1
I read all the topics of this forum ... but I didn't understand ... how this two orders really affects a game : important match and Take it easy ... I understand that it's not a good idea to play two consecutive important matches ... but I didn;t understand how important match order affect the game ... and Take It easy order too ... I guess that " important matches " makes the team play better but this increase the chances of injured players . Is that true ? I guess that " take it easy " makes your team to play worse and the chances of injured players is very poor. Is that true ...? and another question : These orders really affects the game or are not yet implemented ? I played Take it easy once and i got two players injured ( .
|
|
|
Post by maltas on May 13, 2007 8:27:27 GMT 1
Well, this season I only played two matches with "important" tacticts and........I lost both of them in th elast 10 minutes.
|
|
|
Post by dragosv on May 13, 2007 8:43:29 GMT 1
But I guess you played the match away.....
|
|
|
Post by maltas on May 13, 2007 9:52:12 GMT 1
I played one home and one away.
|
|
|
Post by dragosv on May 13, 2007 10:56:04 GMT 1
Please give the matches ID. Playing important doesn´t mean you will win.
|
|
|
Post by maltas on May 13, 2007 15:32:17 GMT 1
The matches ID are 231330 and 258454. Thanks.
|
|
|
Post by dabbeljay on Mar 19, 2008 23:41:55 GMT 1
I still don't get it with the match importance. I play one of the following tactics and thats the effect for the 3rd match (except of playing better in the important games and don't care about injuries)? - normal--normal--normal => nothing happens
- important--important--normal => the normal game is worse
- important--normal--normal => nothing happens
- important--normal--important => the best possibility
So then this could be effect for the take it easy (tie) matches in the 3rd match(except of playing worse in the tie games and don't care about injuries)?: - tie--tie--normal => the normal game is better
- tie--normal--normal => nothing happens
- tie--normal--tie => the worst possibility
Is this right?
|
|
|
Post by tag22 on Mar 20, 2008 16:09:35 GMT 1
I think not! I think it shall be: tie-important-tie => bad in the 3rd game important- important- tie => worst important-tie-important => good tie-tie-important => best
|
|