|
Post by Krisu110 on May 9, 2008 21:27:51 GMT 1
[quote author="[at]jrgalo" timestamp="1210363849" source="/post/47274/thread"]NO PLAYER(with same age) trains faster than other.[/quote]
Ok, check this urself, if u dont belive.
|
|
|
Post by dragosv on May 10, 2008 23:11:52 GMT 1
Show us their skill and give us their TSI. I told you, the TSI depends on their skills, it doens´t mean he trains better (unless you train him bad).
Edit: I told you that the better the player, the more TSI that he recieves every training.
For example a 2 players of 20 yo:
One has 30 and 30 in wing skills, the other has 20 and 20 in wing skills. The first one will recieve more TSI, but the same skills.
The thing is that when the TSI recalculates the value of the player, the first one still has +10 in principal skills, but in stead of 30, he has 31, and the TSI evolution will be bigger.
There is no country conspiration.
|
|
stars
Junior Handball Manager
Posts: 39
|
Post by stars on Jun 10, 2008 8:25:41 GMT 1
Hi I agree on the last message posted. It does not only matter thair age. Even if the players have the same age, the one can rise more in TSI than the other. This depends on the TSI on the players before the training. But if you have 2 players at 17 years both with a 10000 tsi and both playing a position with focus on for the same amount of time in the game, they will rise equally. I have an other question though, maybe someone would like to share some knowledge on that. I would like to train my players well (like everyone else) ;D What would be best to do? I have 4 backs to be trained. I want to give my 2 best backs 100% training, and therefore the other 2 naturally can´t recieve 100% as well. Lets assume it is a Saturday-game. Only the players in this game gets training on Mondays since there only is this match between Friday and Monday training. How will my 2 other backs get most training? Should I let them play as subs on the backs position?? this will give them 60% training on positions with FOCUS on. OR....... Should I let them play on Playmaker and Lineplayer positions as 100% positions WITHOUT FOCUS. Thought is: Could 100% non-focus training give more than 60% focus position??? I hope to hear some clever answers Table looks like this. (just for information) 40-60 minuts played: 100% 35 minuts played: 89% 30 minuts played: 79% 25 minuts played: 69% 20 minuts played: 60% 10 minuts played: 40% 5 minuts played: 30% 3 minuts or less played: 0% I can also see that about 35 & 25 minutes played, will give most training overall on 4 players. But assume that I do want 100% on the first two players.
|
|
|
Post by Krisu110 on Jun 11, 2008 7:33:51 GMT 1
I recommend u to put all the back to the first seven. Because 1)i've seen that all the teams, which want to train more than 2 players on one position, they put them to first seven. 2) I do i myself and i see that even the other players in first seven train well.
Sure they will not get same training as players u have focused on, but they train better than in sub.
If the next match isnt such a important and u have enough good players to put on LP and PM, then try to put the not-focused backs into sub. Next game put them into first seven and check, when they trained more, after first game or after second game. I'm quite sure that they train better if they are in first seven.
Hope i helped u, Hc postipõrge
|
|